Edited by Jess Faraday
Eight stories involving mysteries and death and tea. (Pretty obvious by the title, eh? lol) Some are cozy, some aren’t. Set in the past and the future. From a misfiled book to a stolen mouse to death by mechanical spider, there’s a variety of mysteries for everyone.
Some stories don’t deal with death (i.e. the misfiled book, a stolen mouse, a recovered Romanov egg.) I found most of the plots pretty good. The tea group story reminded me of a plot by Sayers. The very short story, as mentioned below, was basically an explanation for something that happened before the story started.
Edith Chauvaune Jones: medical examiner, graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, played basketball at Penn
Beatrice Winser: librarian
Darcy McKay: slender, blonde, amateur P.I., attends University of Illinois-Chicago
Sofia Goodreck: private investigator, blind
Anne Holcomb: works in a psychological lab
Audrey Louise Plotz: appraiser, gemologist
Claire Leighton: gardener, drives a Mini Cooper, middle aged, fake psychic
Short stories mean quick hits on characters. Not much description on some of them. In fact in the tea group story I didn’t see a name for the main character telling the story. But most of the characters, and the supporting cast, were pretty good and likeable.
Pretty good voices throughout. Some come through very well – the blind detective, the target of the tea group, Winser.
Some profanity. I found some of the stories confusing. One very short story didn’t really involved a ‘mystery’ per se, but was the ending to what could have been a longer story. This one was the explanation at the end of a long mystery. In the final story, POV jumps and although I might have accepted a shift from Claire to the cop, when the narrator takes over in Claire’s memories, the narrator jumps to the POV of a third party, something Claire wouldn’t know about.
For an anthology promoting tea, the beverage plays a major role in only one story. In others, it’s a token mention. In the first story, it’s a quick mention and the story centers more on basketball than it does on the death.
There was a bit of tension in the blind detective story which was good.
I found no grammar/spelling/punctuation mistakes.
There’s something here for different tastes, though, and despite the problems, most were enjoyable.
By Gerry Fostaty
Michael Dion is just a Toronto actor in love with another member of the cast of a play in which he has but a supporting role. However, he is destined for a different part when his attractive co-worker, Amanda, asks him for assistance in finding a missing teenager, son of pair of friends. Soon, Dion is in deep with drug dealers and rescue operations. The problem with this bit of acting, if he bombs, he may not live to regret it.
Actors as detectives. Okay, sounded pretty good at first but it started livening up when other members of the play became involved. This is different from other mysteries where ‘the average Joe with a mundane job becomes a private investigator’.
Michael Dion: early 30s, actor, owns a cat, divorced
Amanda Clarke: actress, smoky voice, steel grey eyes
Elizabeth ‘Bid’ Stackhouse: 26, stage manager, wears glasses, freckles, short brown hair, compact frame, former Army
David Pound: play director, tall, large build
Nigel Holmes: early 30s, dark hair and eyes, British, physically fit, smokes
Cal: college student, works a doorman at raves, bodybuilder, large frame, father worked on city road construction
Megan: early 20s, tattooed
Karen Eaton: slim, fit, blonde, married with son, drives a black Murano, husband is in Parliament
A nice, uh, cast of characters. Lol. Each have a particular, uh, role, which fits in nicely with the mystery. If ‘the average Joe’ can incorporate any unique qualities or specializations into the story to help solve the case, that makes it all the better. The characters in this book use, obviously, their acting abilities when dealing the bad guys.
Not too much description of Dion and Amanda so I didn’t quite get a mental picture of either. I did enjoy Nigel and Elizabeth in the, uh, supporting roles. Lol. I wasn’t too sure about Karen. Maybe she didn’t come off as a strong characters as I would have thought she would. Her description fit a politician’s socialite wife but other than her being appropriately worried over her son, I just didn’t think she fit.
Nigel’s British-ness comes through and Elizabeth’s directorial type voice.
First person from Dion’s POV. Some profanity. Good tension. A bit drawn out when the scenes were on the play rehearsal and performance and A bit at the end. However, some good surprises and the ending sets up for a sequel.
Darn good story.
By Eric Turowski
How can a dead serial killer from ten years ago returned to haunt Mara Singleton, a ghost hunter? The detective who solved the decade old case thinks it’s a demon. How can a dead serial kidnapper of children return to torment Mara’s psychic father? His psychic associates are there to help. What is haunting a San Francisco area house owned by a couple of Mara’s friends? Mara and her investigative team are on the case.
Enter the paranormal world and be prepared to be scared. There is plenty of story here and enough side stories to keep me interested. I have to to steal the line from the Chiller channel – scary good.
Mara Singleton: paranormal investigator, owns PsiCom, psychic, drives a Toyota, graduated San Francisco State, former insurance investigator, author
Everett Singleton: Mara’s father, divorced, uses a cane, black hair white at the temples, tall, psychic, former stock broker
Sam Bradford: rank of Lieutenant, divorced, trying to quit smoking
Mike Halloway: overweight, owns a contracting firm, owns a cat
Bridgett Halloway: Mike’s wife, pregnant, gold-brown eyes, works in IT
Ben Fredericks: Mara’s boyfriend, attended San Francisco State, likes to cycle, hike and rock climb, sells insurance
Arthur: 6’5”, thin, geomancer
Delores ‘Dee-Dee’ Delacroix: bird like, upper 70s, psychometrist
Holly Owen: Reverend, wavy black hair, sharp nose, CPA
More characters than I thought. Not that this is bad at times, but the supporting roles weren’t as strong as I would have liked. This is due to the three stories going on so something has to suffer. This is disappointing because I liked the supporting cast and wanted more from them.
Some instances of periods where there should be commas and vice-verse. Some lectures but not too bad. Voices come through relatively well. An aged priest and some of the associates of Everett and Mara are pretty distinctive.
Book is separated into Parts. Some chapters are headed by date. Profanity.
There are many instances of ‘ing’ action words following actions. This is fine sometimes, but sometimes it doesn’t work. What works-and when it does, I think it should be used sparingly-is when the first action assists the second action. i.e. – He pushed her, knocking her back against the wall. Okay, this could work although I might have rewritten the sentence to dispense with the ‘ing’ word. The second action is happening at the same time, or nearly so, as the first action. The above example isn’t a sentence from the story, however, this one is: Jerry reached in, pulling out a long cylindrical case. In this case, I don’t think it works because one can’t reach in and pull out at the same time. Jerry reached in and pulled out a… works better. It may be minor, but I saw several instances where sentences could have been rewritten to work or sound better. The ‘ing’ words denote an action happening at the time and many times I found in this story, that sentences could have been tighter had they been written to eliminate the ‘ing’ word.
Otherwise the scare factor was pretty good. The author did a nice job of bouncing from one story to the next. The action was tight. I was a bit confused at the point where Mara was overwhelmed by the demon and only because the next day, but the explanation is fine…and eerie.
And get ready for a wild and wicked ending.
To be fair, with the errors, I should give this a green. However, the ‘like’ factor kicked in and I enjoy a scary story that shows me something different or presents the horror in a fresh way. This one does, so, with grudging reluctance, I’ll bump up the rank, with a caution that next time, no more Mr. Nice Guy. Lol.
By Jed Power
1993. New Hampshire. Hampton Beach in June is filling up with tourists, snowbirds returning home, and murder. Bartender Dan Marlowe, jogging on the beach one morning discovers the corpse of a powerful real estate agent. Almost immediately, one pesky detective thinks Dan is the culprit. To clear his name, Dan, with help from his coworkers, begins to look into possible suspects – a radio talk show host, the dead woman’s brother, a local businessman wanting to make a huge profit. And do a couple of lowlife hustlers and their bad-news associates have anything to do with the case?
Ah, the oft seen guy in trouble with the law turned investigator. This is a decent plot with the usual cast of suspects.
Dan Marlowe: bartender, suffers from anxiety, ex drug user, owns a shotgun and a .38, former bar/restaurant owner, drives an ’86 green Chevette, divorced with children, allergic to cats
Richard Gant: Lieutenant in the Hampton police department, iron gray hair
Steve Moore: with the police department, buzz cut, married and has an adopted son
Michael “Shamrock” Kelly: dishwasher, smokes
Morris Kruel: short brown hair, thin neck
Henry Fuller: white hair, blue eyes
Arite “Tiny Bastards” Neal: radio talk show host, drives a Cadillac, dyed thinning black hair, overweight, pasty complexion, married with children
Dianne Dennison: Dan’s boss and girlfriend, long black hair
Eddie Hoar: short, thin pockmarked face, oily black hairy, hustler, drives a Cadillac
George Ransom: motel owner, bald, big frame, 40s
A lot of expected characters. Just tidbits of info for each, just enough for the reader to get a taste of them without drowning in background information.
There’s a minor attempt to sound local. It’s difficult to stay consistent unless seen often enough. Kelly’s voice, Irish, of course, comes through the best. Conversations don’t wander or contain too much extraneous material.
First person from Dan’s POV. Relatively short chapters. Some profanity.
A few times, just enough to be noticeable but not enough to be irritating, several sentences in a paragraph started with the same word, usually ‘he’ or ‘I’.
Some good similes sprinkled throughout. I don’t know if it was intentional but there is a little bit of a noir feeling to this story. Not much, just a touch.
Good tight writing, maybe a few extraneous words here and there and only one period missing that I found.
Pretty decent story. Third in the series.
I considered Green Belt, but, what the hec, I’m in a good mood (lol) and enjoyed the book.
By Jim Heskett
Tucker Candle, software tech, weeks away from unemployment. Married with a pregnant wife. One night an enigmatic stranger gives him a warning to refuse an assignment from his boss. When Candle ignores the warning, he returns home to find his wife missing and a dead man in his bathroom. And his life is only going to get worse – strangers attack him, another corpse shows up, and he can’t trust the cops.
Okay, this is a weird one. Not your normal murder mystery. This plot is unusual in the sense it’s not something seen in countless other books. There’s a bit of mystery, sure, but a bit of supernatural, a bit of surreal.
Tucker Candle: married, works at Intellicraft, Mom dead, knows martial arts
Kareem: short brown hair, dark skin, thin mustache
Alison Roche: Tucker’s boss
Wyatt Green: Chief Operating Officer for Intellicraft, broad shouldered, married with children, baseball fan
Some physical description. I didn’t get a picture of Candle. Several characters come and go and I started wondering about each new one – can this person be trusted? Is this person part of the overall plot? This is not a bad thing. A good mystery should have the reader wonder about everybody from the bellhop to the CEO.
Not too bad. Some voices come through.
First person from Candle’s POV. Some profanity.
Some good action and tension. This is the first of a trilogy so-if I can be forgiven a bit of a spoiler (or a non-spoiler), don’t expect everything to be wrapped up at the end. Jimmy’s got some ‘splainin to do. This first book will leave a lot of questions unanswered, but that’s okay, because it will leave you wanting the second part.
By Cassidy Salem
Adina Donati works at a think tank in Washington, D.C. One night she and a friend go out for drinks and the friend ends up dead in the restroom. In time, Donati comes to believe that the project on which her friend was working may relate to her murder. When she begins investigating, she puts herself in danger.
Basic plot. Not complex or intricate.
Adina Donati: 25, administrative assistant for Drake University for Policy Planning and Research, dark wavy hair, fair complexion, brown eyes, enjoys photography, fluent in several languages
Jonathan Saks: Homicide detective, average features, former New York cop
Daniel Sullivan: lawyer, tall, dark hair and eyes, homosexual
Kaye Blunt: Human Resources Director at Adina’s employer
Matt Murphy: Director of Energy Programs, mid fifties, large stomach, has five children
Grayson: has the title of Doctor, director at Adina’s employer
Michelle: 25, works with Adina
Duncan Fletcher: Adina’s former boyfriend, sandy hair, almost 6′
Bruce Dunn: dark hair, olive complexion, green eyes, over 6′, physiotherapist
A lot of characters, very few with physical descriptions including the main character. I didn’t get a picture of her.
I thought with the number of characters, there might be some red herring suspects thrown in, but most of the cast is filler. Duncan, who could have been a prime suspect, was demoted, as are most others, to a minor role. Bruce and Jonathan get some spotlight, but where Bruce might have made for another wonderful suspect, nothing portended possible danger. Ditto with coworkers.
Conversations tend to stay short with not much action going on during them. A little, but not much. As I mention below about Adina doing things that don’t relate to the murder, there are several conversations that are wasted space – talking with friends, family, etc. Many conversations ran to sympathizing with Adina about her friend’s death, have the police any leads, no not really, okay how about your love life. Again, with so many characters, conversations could have added tension, suspicion, clues.
First person from Adina’s POV. Relatively short chapters. Pretty quick read.
After the murder is committed, nearly 45% of the book is covered before some link to the mystery is seen. There is a lot of Adina doing stuff – talking to friends, visiting the zoo, etc, that doesn’t do anything but fill space. I kept wanting her to find a clue to the murder.
The entire motive seemed a bit weak because I didn’t see any solid ‘stuff’. Connections were too loose. The explanation was too pat. No surprises. The climactic scene near the end wasn’t very tension filled and when it ended, so did the story, for the most part.
Clean writing. No grammar/punctuation/spelling problems. I just didn’t feel close to the story.
By Robert Pruneda
Three children are slaughtered in a cemetery. The fourth, the lone survivor then watches as his parent are similarly murdered. Who…or what killed them? Detective Aaron Sanders’ investigation leads him down a dark path, one where he can’t believe his eyes…or his dreams. Or can he? As the case deepens and the body count rises, Sanders enters a world where evil reigns and the fate of one child rests in his hands.
For a murder mystery horror, it’s hard to beat a good scary tale. This one has suspense and the supernatural.
Aaron Sanders: Austin homicide investigator, drives a black ’81 Corvette, divorced twice, parents dead, ex smoker, played football in high school
David Hernandez: police chief
Cody Sumner: blond
Donald Luther: medical examiner
Kenneth Chandler: tall, middle aged, married with son, owns dogs, owns a Corvette
Gene Bukowski: psychologist
Robert Smith: married with two children, works in advertising
Reggie Santiago: works in a funeral home with his dad, played football in high school
Steven Riley: detective, tall, twenties, black hair, father was a cop, former youth minister
Jerome Hadley: director of a youth home, British
A nice cast although I had difficulty getting a mental picture of some of them because physical descriptions weren’t prevalent. Sanders comes off as a walk-the-line cop who takes chances when he believes he’s right. There is the counselor who plays the romantic interest with just the right amount of play-hard-to-get.
Some good voices, especially from Hernandez. Dialogue is succinct with the right amount of humor, sarcasm, etc.
Chapters are titled. Profanity. Most of the book is first person from Aaron’s POV. Some punctuation problems (commas in the wrong places). However, I won’t count off too much since I was reading an ARC.
The author did a good job of showing reality when it comes to DNA testing.
There’s an interesting twist at the end but at the end I didn’t quite understand the relationship between the monster and the child. Not when other characters had other explanations of what needed to happen.
Action might have used a bit more show than tell but it was still tight and good. The fight scenes lasted long enough to be real.
There was a long build up to the scary stuff. This doesn’t mean the story dragged. The build up lasted awhile which was okay.
This was a well-written story with some good scary. Keep the lights on and…maybe watch those dreams at night…
By Dale Wiley
1995. Trent Norris in an intern for the NEA. One day he intercepts an enigmatic message and soon after a murder is committed that Trent connects to the message. Now he’s on the run, framed for the murder and committing crimes himself to stay one step ahead of the bad guys.
An amusement filled story that tells of ‘an innocent caught up in something he can’t escape’. Interesting time frame too, before the Internet became the rage, before Smart phones and tablets.
Trent Norris: 22, National Endowment for the Arts intern, formerly an intern for many groups and individuals, drives a Toyota, owns a guitar, majored in English at Emory University
Joe: Trent’s boss, bearded, barrel chested, baritone
Kurt: office manager in Trent’s department, homosexual, blond, handsome
Stephanie: 25, average height, shoulder length brown hair, brown eyes, law student at Georgetown, attended Charleston College, majored in English and Engineering, athletic
Tabitha Robertson: Stephanie’s friend, blonde, father is into horse racing, majored in engineering, mother dead, has two brothers
Angie: Trent’s roommate
Many character’s, including the girlfriend, don’t have last names and/or not much physical description. I don’t recall Trent’s last name being given till several chapters in.
Some good voices. Trent does a good job imitating voices.
First person from Trent’s POV. Book divided into Days. A bit of mild profanity. A few punctuation mistakes that I can let slide because I read a pre-release copy. I’ll assume the final copy will have been proofread and corrections made.
A few small lol moments and general light-hearted scenes throughout despite the serious nature of the situation. It’s one that if you don’t think too deeply about it, it’s enjoyable.
Good use of period technology – intranet, zip disks, etc.
However, I have a small problem with the cause of Trent’s reason for running. Without playing spoiler: at his workplace, he intercepts a message about somebody ‘taking care of a problem’. He puts the message on a supervisor’s desk. Then later, after the murder and Trent’s connecting it to the message, he places another ‘I know what you did’ message under the supervisor’s door. Then the troubles begin. My question is: how did the supervisor and/or the bad guys know it was Trent who took the original message and placed the second under the door. It’s not like he signed them. The explanation given later is not exactly a leap over a chasm, but maybe a gap. Not too far-fetched but not rock solid either
The other problem is: yes, I know the author, to make a story, had to have Trent run all over town, but the sensible thing would have been to go to the police-as Trent had originally thought about-and explain everything. He wasn’t in all that much trouble at first.
This author has a similar problem I have in my first person writing, which is staying close to the character in scene. Sometimes, in the moment the narrator-first-person steps in and takes the reader out of the action/tension/emotion. The reader loses touch with the character.
Some unnecessary ‘ly’ words. A bit tighter writing all around is needed, but still a decent mystery that just gets crazier by the moment.
By Matt Baak
Bank robbers have stolen far more from a high secure vault than what expected to find. In addition to hundreds of millions in movie companies’ bearer bonds, they looted a national treasure given to the United States by Japan, and plans for a new submarine. Enter Kip Keplar, FBI consultant, who takes on the case.
It starts as a pretty good who- and how-dunnit. However, with ‘no time to lose’ there seems to be an awful lot of time that goes by with nothing happening. The mystery and the investigation get shoved onto a back burner amidst all of the extra stuff that doesn’t have anything to do with the main story. Plus, the plot gets more un-believable as it goes along.
Kip Keplar: 36, athletic, long flaxen blond hair, cobalt blue eyes, married with three children, operates a charity, drives a black A8 Audi, inherited wealth, former FBI and CIA agent, has a brother
Cam Walker: 44, senior VP of American Trust Bank, black curly hair, black eyes, 5’10”, on his second marriage, drives a silver Mercedes SL550 Roadster
Enrique ‘Ricky’ Alvaro: ex Marine
Mogul: smokes, criminal, missing the both small toes, average features
Reginald G. Parrington: bank president, nervous personality, short black hair, wears glasses
John Brozski: L.A. FBI Branch Assistant Director, 6’2”, athletic, steel gray balding hair,
Jessica Eggins: 45, small stature, works for the Smithsonian Institute, 5′ dark hair, dark eyes, pale skin
Sam ‘Little Sammy’ Cirrelli: father, brother and son dead, 5’9”, dark hair, mobster
One problem I had with Kip is I didn’t know what his job was until I was farther into the book. FBI employee or consultant or John’s friend? He ran a charity but there was no solid connection to the FBI until a much later explanation. (See continuity problem below.)
There’s a scene where an FBI agent makes a joke to a man who’s wife in the hospital? No!
A lot of secondary or minor characters with way too much background info.
I couldn’t sense any voices. Some characters spoke very formally, others tried to sound like a baddie. Conversations tended to be short or very long explanations.
Some chapters are headed by date, time, and location. Short and long chapters.
A few misspelled words.
There is a lot of ‘telling’ by the narrator especially in the action scenes. Just once did I get anywhere close to a character in scene. By staying at a distance, there are POV shifts within paragraphs and I lost the sense of tension. The narrator sometimes went farther out to make a general statement about matters, then back in toward the action. By doing this, the feel for the moment is lost, there is no emotion/feeling shown.
Some paragraphs have several sentences in a row that begin with the same word. One I saw had every sentence begin with ‘He’. Another word was ‘it’.
One strange thing I didn’t understand: Kip is desperately needed at the FBI office to discuss the case but when he arrives, he waits a long time before seeing anyone, and then is rushed again, but in the next scene he’s waiting around to hear a lengthy story.
Continuity problem (sort of): In a flashback several chapters in, it is told that Kip was a new FBI agent when he met his future wife. Then just paragraphs later, he decides to quit the CIA. This problem was solved a few chapters later with an explanation but it made for confusion before. The reader needs to know who and what Kip is before a third of the book is gone.
A lot of the writing, especially from the narrator, could have been tighter. (Example: With Kip by her side and Mette, as they could best determine, being within an acceptable state of stable health and of sound mind, they were sat down and told, that for her, the birth of a child was no longer possible.) This is a convoluted sentence that could have been written in a clearer manner. As best who could determine? ‘That for her’ – well, who else would we be speaking about? Certainly not Kip. (Example: “I’ve made arrangements with the hospital to see her early tomorrow morning to see if we can learn anything from her directly.”) ‘Directly’ is not needed. It’s understood the patient is the person to whom the agent will be speaking. (Example: One chapter starts with a discussion of a town and Cam’s inability to have a house across a state border. Then the scene switches to a hospital room. What was the point of the opening paragraph?
Not believable: The Navy keeping plans for a secret submarine in a bank vault. Navy personnel discussing the details of the secret submarine to FBI agents and consultants.
A lot of material in many scenes are extraneous and too long.
This is a lot of scattered stuff with a hint of cohesion. I had thought for awhile I’d give this a rank of yellow, but the more I read, the more matters stop being believable.
By Douglas Spencer Wallis
Britsher Basil Ackroyd, mayor of the French town of Durac, is in trouble. He owes his Italian uncle a lot of money. An insurance investigator has questions regarding a fire. One of his buildings is desired by the local constabulary and Basil’s wife, but is reported to be available as a refuge for illegal immigrants. An old ‘friend’ shows up with another scheme to pay owed debts…but winds up dead instead. Meanwhile, a young woman in the government is outraged at the reports of illegals and plans to make Basil pay.
Add in a Russian and a Chinese and this makes for a crazy complex concoction. The plot jumps from item to item so try to keep up.
Basil Ackroyd: British, mayor of the French town of Durac, smokes cigars, has a sister, owns a motorbike, rotund stomach, has children, has a mustache
Elizabeth Lindy Ackroyd: Basil’s wife, company owner
Sid: cafe owner
Jack Waldo ‘Ginger’ Frampton: drives a Mercedes truck, divorced
Leticia Frampton: obese, Ginger’s sister
Claudine Dubois: insurance investigator
Abdul Bin Avay: has some gold in his teeth, dark skin, notary public
Jean Paul Beauclaire: has the rank of Captain
Everybody in this book is nuts. Basil reminds me a bit of Cleese’s Basil Fawlty. Not many physical descriptions for characters, but I could get a vague sense of them through their personalities.
Basil’s secretary’s voice comes through because of her personality. So does Leticia’s. Some conversations tend to go back and forth at a rapid pace like an old radio comedy. Near the end there are lengthy explanatory conversations.
This reads like a comedy show. There’s some corny humor, prat fall type antics and a roundabout way of getting to the end. It’s a different read than most. With so many characters with so many connections, it took me awhile to get into it and even when I started too, it veered off around another corner.
Still a pretty good read. I debated awhile on what rank to give it but decided that the clean writing (I didn’t see mistakes in grammar, spelling, etc) earned it: